BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From marko@joh.to
Subject BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used
Date
Msg-id 20140926080211.7639.68358@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used
Re: BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used
List pgsql-bugs
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      11500
Logged by:          Marko Tiikkaja
Email address:      marko@joh.to
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.12
Operating system:   Linux
Description:

Hi,

We've been observing a performance problem where a PRIMARY KEY index is not
being used.  The problem looks like this:

pg2=#* explain analyze select * from events where eventid = 132685185 and
processed = 0;
                                                            QUERY PLAN


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using index_events_processed on events  (cost=0.00..7.73 rows=1
width=106) (actual time=31.808..31.808 rows=0 loops=1)
   Index Cond: (processed = 0)
   Filter: (eventid = 132685185)
 Total runtime: 31.852 ms
(4 rows)

pg2=#* explain analyze select * from events where eventid = 132685185 and
processed+0 = 0;
                                                      QUERY PLAN

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using events_pkey on events  (cost=0.00..12.38 rows=1 width=106)
(actual time=0.071..0.071 rows=0 loops=1)
   Index Cond: (eventid = 132685185)
   Filter: ((processed + 0) = 0)
 Total runtime: 0.109 ms
(4 rows)


I'm guessing that's happening because the index on processed is smaller
(7GB, relpages=900880 vs 3.7GB, relpages=478225).  The statistics say that
there are no rows where processed=0 (and it's not far from the truth), but
it's still a risky plan compared to the PK lookup.  The index
index_events_processed is an index on events(processed), which should
probably be a partial index on  WHERE processed = 0, but I thought I'd
report this plan anyway.

Any thoughts?

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #11457: The below query crashes 9.3.5, but not 9.3.4
Next
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used