On 2014-09-22 15:46:48 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/18/14 7:40 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I fail to see why that is so much preferrable for you to passing
> > parameter to DO?
> >
> > 1) You need to think about unique names for functions
> > 2) Doesn't work on HOT STANDBYs
> > 3) Causes noticeable amount of catalog bloat
> > 4) Is about a magnitude or two more expensive
>
> Doesn't this apply to all temporary objects? It would also be great to
> have temporary tables, temporary indexes, temporary triggers, temporary
> extensions, etc. that don't have the above problems. I think inventing
> a separate mechanism for working around each instance of this problem
> would end up being very confusing.
Meh. Those aren't comparable. TEMPORARY TABLES/INDEXES/... all live
beyond a single statement. What's being discussed here doesn't.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
