Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 20140820233338.GA21584@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-07-25 18:29:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > *         QNX lacks sigaction SA_RESTART: I modified "src/include/port.h" to define macros to retry system calls
uponEINTR (open,read,write,...) when compiled on QNX
 
> 
> That's pretty scary too.  For one thing, such macros would affect every
> call site whether it's running with SA_RESTART or not.  Do you really
> need it?  It looks to me like we just turn off HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS if
> you don't have SA_RESTART.  Maybe that code has bit-rotted by now, but
> it did work at one time.

I have pretty much no trust that we're maintaining
!HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL. And none that we have that capability of doing so. I
seriously doubt there's any !HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL animals and
873ab97219caabeb2f7b390268a4fe01e2b7518c makes it pretty darn unlikely
that we have much chance of finding such mistakes during development.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental backup: add backup profile to base backup
Next
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: Verbose output of pg_dump not show schema name