On 2014-08-20 00:58:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I don't much like adding a separate function for every SSL implementation,
> but you've got a point that it would be nice to make it difficult to call
> PQgetSSLstruct() and just assume that the returned struct is e.g an OpenSSL
> struct, while it's actually something else. Perhaps:
A good reason to not have functions with the respective functions is
that it requires either including the relevant headers or adding forward
declarations of the libraries type.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
