On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:57:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe this is telling us it's not worth changing the representation,
> and we should just go do something about the first_success_by threshold
> and be done. I'm hesitant to draw such conclusions on the basis of a
> single use-case though, especially one that doesn't really have that
> much use for compression in the first place. Do we have other JSON
> corpuses to look at?
Yes, that is what I was expecting --- once the whitespace and syntax
sugar is gone in JSONB, I was unclear how much compression would help.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
