On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 08:51:13AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > At 2014-08-07 23:22:43 +0900, masao.fujii@gmail.com wrote:
> >> That is, we log replication commands only when log_statement is set to
> >> all. Neither new parameter is introduced nor log_statement is
> >> redefined as a list.
> >
> > That sounds good to me.
>
> It sounds fairly unprincipled to me. I liked the idea of making
> log_statement a list, but if we aren't gonna do that, I think this
> should be a separate parameter.
I am unclear there is enough demand for a separate replication logging
parameter --- using log_statement=all made sense to me.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
