David G Johnston wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera-9 wrote
> > I think this merits a new GUC flag, say GUC_LIST_ADDITIVE.
>
> Would that allow, without any special syntax, multiple declarations of, say,
> shared_preload_libraries, to have their values appended instead of the most
> (or least, I forget which) recent one overwrite (or be ignored by) the
> existing value?
>
> The idea of requiring "+=" instead of just "=" is not particularly
> appealing...
I'm not sold on += as the syntax to use. It just needs to be something
different from =. But I am thinking that whatever it is, it would be
required. Otherwise, for example if you have search_path=foo in
postgresql.conf and search_path=bar in auto.conf via ALTER SYSTEM, you
would end up with search_path=foo,bar instead of just bar which I think
would be the expected outcome. Of course, we would offer a new ALTER
SYSTEM option to indicate that you want to have auto.conf use += instead
of =.
The idea behing GUC_LIST_ADDITIVE is that += is only supported for
variables that have that flag set. If you tried to use += with other
variables, an error would be raised.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services