Tom Lane wrote:
> It might also be reasonable to create a wrapper macro along the line of
> "PG_STD_IO_BUFFERING()" that would encapsulate the whole sequence
> setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IOLBF, 0);
> setvbuf(stderr, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
> Or maybe we should have separate macros for those two calls. Or maybe
> this is just a useless layer of abstraction and PG_IOLBF is enough
> to make the calls portable.
>
> Thoughts?
I don't really know all that much about this stuff, but see commits
6eda3e9c27781dec369542a9b20cba7c3d832a5e and its parent about
isolationtester.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
