Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:07:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > In the "INDEX" case, should the output mention specifically which index
> > > is being considered?
> >
> > Ah, good idea. Updated patch attached. The output is now:
> >
> > test=> \d+ test
> > Table "public.test"
> > Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description
> > --------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+-------------
> > x | integer | not null | plain | |
> > Indexes:
> > "test_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (x) REPLICA IDENTITY
> > "i_test2" btree (x)
> > --> Replica Identity: USING INDEX "test_pkey"
> > Has OIDs: no
> >
> > However, now that I look at it, it seems redundant as REPLICA IDENTITY
> > is already marked on the actual index. Ideas?
>
> Hearing nothing, I have gone back to the previous patch that just marks
> replica identity as USING INDEX; applied patch attached.
Not opposed to this, but it seems a bit strange; REPLICA IDENTITY is a
property of the table, not of any individual index. I think we should
lose the token in the "Indexes" section.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
