On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:03:46AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> Very good point. I have modified the patch to add this block in all
> >> cases where it was missing. I started to wonder about the comment and
> >> if the Mingw fix was released. Based on some research, I see this as
> >> fixed in mingw-runtime-3.2, released 2003-10-10. That's pretty old.
> >
> > Yeah. I would vote for removing that code in all branches. There is no
> > reason to suppose somebody is going to install 8.4.22 on a machine that
> > they haven't updated mingw on since 2003. Or, if you prefer, just remove
> > it in HEAD --- but going around and *adding* more copies seems like
> > make-work. The fact that we've not heard complaints about the omissions
> > is good evidence that nobody's using the buggy mingw versions anymore.
>
> I don't think it is. Right now we're not checking errno *at all* in a
> bunch of these places, so we're sure not going to get complaints about
> doing it incorrectly in those places. Or do I need more caffeine?
You are correct. This code is seriously broken and I am susprised we
have not gotten more complaints. Good thing readdir/closedir rarely
fail.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
