Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
Date
Msg-id 20140205232019.GG28649@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-02-05 14:07:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I stuck such an Assert in ScanPgRelation, and verified that it doesn't
> break any existing regression tests --- although of course the above
> test case still fails, and now even without declaring an index.
> 
> Barring objections I'll go commit that.  It's a bit pointless to be
> Asserting that catcache.c does nothing unsafe when relcache.c does
> the same things without any such test.
> 
> (Alternatively, maybe we should centralize the asserting in
> systable_beginscan or some such place?)

I don't have a problem with sticking an additional assert elsewhere, but
I think ScanPgRelation, systable_beginscan are a bit late, because they
frequently won't be hit during testing because the lookups will be
cached...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext