Re: Standalone synchronous master - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date
Msg-id 20140110223355.GA13568@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Standalone synchronous master  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Standalone synchronous master  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>)
Re: Standalone synchronous master  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Standalone synchronous master  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-01-10 14:29:58 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> db02 goes down. It doesn't matter why. It is down. db01 continues to accept
> orders, allow people to log into the website and we can still service
> accounts. The continuity of service continues.

Why is that configuration advantageous over a async configuration is the
question. Why, with those requirements, are you using a synchronous
standby at all?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE