> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes:
>>> MULE is completely evil.
>>> It has N different encodings for the same character,
>
>> What's wrong with that? It aims that in the first place.
>
> It greatly complicates comparisons --- at least, if you'd like to preserve
> the principle that strings that appear the same are equal.
You don't need to consider it because there's no place in PostgreSQL
where a MULE encoded text consists of multiple encodings as far as I
know.
BTW, same characters are assigned different code points are pretty
common in many character sets (Unicode, for example).
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
