Tom Lane wrote:
> mle+tools@mega-nerd.com writes:
> > Running the command:
> > PGPASSFILE=pgpass psql --no-password --username myname mydb
> > --command="\dt"
> > works fine if the port number in the pgpass file is correct, but if the port
> > number is incorrect the error message is:
> > psql: fe_sendauth: no password supplied
> > which is highly misleading. Surely the error message should be "connection
> > refused" or some such?
>
> I'm not sure how we could improve that. If the port number in the
> password file doesn't match the intended connection, that means the
> entry doesn't apply to this connection. We can hardly issue error
> messages on the basis of the presence of unrelated entries in a
> .pgpass file. So what the code is seeing is that the server demanded
> a password (or so I'd assume), and it did not have one to give.
I haven't read the code, but my guess is that psql does the following:
a) Grabs the user and database name from command line.
b) Looks up dbname in pgpassfile to get host and port number etc.
c) Connects to host:port and uses supplied username/password.
When the connect fails in step c), the error should be "connection failed".
Is this not how it should work?
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
