Re: Sigh, my old HPUX box is totally broken by DSM patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Sigh, my old HPUX box is totally broken by DSM patch
Date
Msg-id 20131023161535.GM2706@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sigh, my old HPUX box is totally broken by DSM patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Sigh, my old HPUX box is totally broken by DSM patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > Would this make sense as a configure-time check, rather than initdb, to
> > try blocking SIGSYS and checking for an ENOSYS from shm_open()?  Seems
> > preferrable to do that in a configure check rather than initdb.
>
> I don't see why.  It's a run-time behavior; the build system may not
> be where the binaries will ultimately run.

I suppose, just need to be more cautious when blocking signals in initdb
than in a configure-time check, of course.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest II CLosed
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement