Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Date
Msg-id 20131017135151.GD9746@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas escribió:

> Actually, this could be fixed by having a way to declare one of the
> overloaded functions as the preferred option and resolving ambiguous
> calls in favor of the highest-priority function.  In fact,
> EnterpriseDB has added just such an option to Advanced Server 9.3, and
> it fixes several longstanding difficult choices between being
> Oracle-compatible and being PostgreSQL-compatible; we're now more
> compatible with both.

How does this work?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)