Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date
Msg-id 20131009143244.GA3825719@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-10-09 10:30:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus suggested here that work_mem and maintenance_work_mem could
> be auto-tuned like effective_cache_size:
> 
>     http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/50ECCF93.3060101@agliodbs.com
> 
> The attached patch implements this, closely matching the default values
> for the default shared_buffers value:

There imo is no correlation between correct values for shared_buffers
and work_mem at all. They really are much more workload dependant than
anything.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem