Hi,
On 2013-08-07 21:25:06 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The new MultiXactId concept appears in a number of user-facing error
> messages, including in the scary context of transaction ID wraparound,
> so it seems kind of important, but it doesn't appear to be documented in
> any user-facing places. Should this be rectified? Maybe some of the
> material from README.tuplock should be moved to the user manual. Maybe
> a less jargony term could be found as well.
Multixacts aren't really new, they've been there since 8.1 or so. It's
just that their use has been a bit expanded and that their internal
format changed a bit.
WRT user facing messages: I think it'd suffice to explain the
anti-wraparound part of the docs that the same holds true for
multixacts. Doing a more detailed explanation seems to require a good
amount of low level explanations and thus seems unlikely to be actually
read.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
