Josh Berkus wrote:
> -- a couple of compromise proposals were made:
>
> a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get
> credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at
> the bottom of the release notes, or
>
> b) that all "names" move to a web page on www.postgresql.org and come
> out of the release notes entirely.
>
> Speaking as a commitfest manager, I favor compromise proposal (a),
> personally. Does (a) seem somehow terrible to anyone?
I like (a) myself, though I'd amend it so that "extensive work on the
patch" is required to qualify as co-author, which may or may not be
code.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
