On 07/12/2013 01:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> -- a couple of compromise proposals were made:
>>
>> a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get
>> credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at
>> the bottom of the release notes, or
>>
>> b) that all "names" move to a web page on www.postgresql.org and come
>> out of the release notes entirely.
>>
>> Speaking as a commitfest manager, I favor compromise proposal (a),
>> personally. Does (a) seem somehow terrible to anyone?
> I like (a) myself, though I'd amend it so that "extensive work on the
> patch" is required to qualify as co-author, which may or may not be
> code.
>
I'd probably say "substantial" or "non-trivial", but otherwise +1
cheers
andrew
