Jamey Poirier escribió:
>
> Thank you Alvaro. Yes, this explains it.
> It doesn't help to fix it but at least I know now that it's a known "feature".
> I'll have to see about coming up with a work-around as we likely won't get to 9.3 anytime soon.
Perhaps you can use FOR SHARE instead of FOR UPDATE in the first
connection, for instance ..
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services