Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date
Msg-id 20130628075212.GB11757@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-06-28 16:30:16 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > When I ran VACUUM FULL, I got the following error.
> >
> > ERROR:  attempt to apply a mapping to unmapped relation 16404
> > STATEMENT:  vacuum full;
> This can be reproduced when doing a vacuum full on pg_proc,
> pg_shdescription or pg_db_role_setting for example, or relations that
> have no relfilenode (mapped catalogs), and a toast relation. I still
> have no idea what is happening here but I am looking at it. As this
> patch removes reltoastidxid, could that removal have effect on the
> relation mapping of mapped catalogs? Does someone have an idea?

I'd guess you broke "swap_toast_by_content" case in cluster.c? We cannot
change the oid of a mapped relation (including indexes) since pg_class
in other databases wouldn't get the news.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeevan Chalke
Date:
Subject: Re: checking variadic "any" argument in parser - should be array
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY