Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]
Date
Msg-id 20130621041612.GB5395@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:10:25AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter escribió:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:59:27PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> 
> > > In my testing of sub-queries in the FILTER clause (an extension
> > > to the spec), I was able to produce the following error:
> > 
> > Per the spec, 
> > 
> > B) A <filter clause> shall not contain a <query expression>, a
> > <window function>, or an outer reference.
> 
> If this is not allowed, I think there should be a clearer error
> message.  What Dean showed is an internal (not user-facing) error
> message.

Folding to lower isn't allowed by the spec either, and then there's
the matter of arrays...

Before going to lots of trouble to figure out how to throw an error
that says, "only the spec and no further," I'd like to investigate how
to make this work.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls