Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From 'Bruce Momjian'
Subject Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report
Date
Msg-id 20130517134405.GF16506@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:22:59AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Yes, that would be user-visible, though we rarely add details like
> > that.
> > What queries are faster, that users would understand?
> 
> Example:
> CREATE TABLE tbl_parent (c01 numeric, c02 int); 
>                       
> CREATE TABLE tbl_child () INHERITS(tbl_parent); 
> 
> INSERT INTO tbl_child (SELECT floor(random() * 10000), n FROM
> generate_series(0, 10000000 - 1) n); 
> 
> SELECT * FROM tbl_parent;
> 
> Any such cases where user is selecting more number of columns from parent
> table will improve a lot.

Sorry, I am still not seeing how this fits into the release notes.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: \watch stuck on execution of commands returning no tuples