Re: Enabling Checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Enabling Checksums
Date
Msg-id 20130417181017.GQ5343@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Enabling Checksums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Enabling Checksums
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 01:29:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Uh, not sure how pg_upgrade would detect that as the version number is
> > not stored in pg_controldata, e.g.:
> 
> >     Data page checksums:                  enabled/disabled
> 
> That seems pretty shortsighted.  The field probably ought to be defined
> as containing a checksum algorithm ID number, not a boolean.
> 
> But having said that, I'm not sure why this would be pg_upgrade's
> problem.  By definition, we do not want pg_upgrade running around
> looking at individual data pages.  Therefore, whatever we might do
> about checksum algorithm changes would have to be something that can be
> managed on-the-fly by the newer server.

Well, my idea was that pg_upgrade would allow upgrades from old clusters
with the same checksum algorithm version, but not non-matching ones. 
This would allow the checksum algorithm to be changed and force
pg_upgrade to fail.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums