* Andres Freund (andres@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> Also, it changes how privileged the people that get access to the
> vulnerability are. If they are allowed to install at the same time as
> everyone else its somewhat fair game, otherwise there will be people
> making a marketing distinction out of their privileged access.
I do not consider this a game where everyone should be treated 'fairly'
wrt their exposure to attackers. I would be open to including something
in the policy which discourages members from advertising their
membership as a marketing distinction, but I'm not convinced that it's
necessary.
Thanks,
Stephen
