Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Date
Msg-id 20130225213400.GF3849@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2013-02-25 22:27:21 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Why?

The concrete usecase is having some form of nesting available for a
shared_library.

shared_preload_libraries = 'bdr'
bdr.connections = 'a, b'
bdr.a.dsn = '...'
bdr.a.xxx = '...'
bdr.b.dsn = '...'


> There are no multilevels structures in pg. Variables should be joined
> with schemas or extensions. Other levels are messy.

So? What does the one existing level SQL have to do with
postgresql.conf? And why is it messy?

Not that as I said before
SET foo.bar.blub = '1'; currently is already allowed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names