On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 09:55:29PM -0500, Phil Sorber wrote:
> >>> I think that output is important as do others up thread. I think it'd
> >>> be simpler to just disable dbname's ability to double as conninfo. If
> >>> we are looking for easy, that is.
> >>>
> >>> I don't mind duplicating the behavior from conninfo_array_parse() or
> >>> uri-regress.c either. I can just put a comment that at some point in
> >>> the future we should add a libpq interface for it.
> >>
> >> I suggest duplicate the code for 9.3, and submit a patch to refactor
> >> into a new libpq function for CF2013-next. If the patch is simple
> >> enough, we can consider putting it into 9.3.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Fujii Masao
>
> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
> it will get plenty of debate on it's own.
If we could run pg_isready on the patch, it would tell us if the patch
is ready. Consider this a feature request. ;-)
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
