Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
Date
Msg-id 20130131.160543.662890227443085399.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>>> So if my understating is correct, 1)Tomas Vondra commits to work on
>>>> Windows support for 9.4, 2)on the assumption that one of Andrew
>>>> Dunstan, Dave Page or Magnus Hagander will help him in Windows
>>>> development.
>>>>
>>>> Ok? If so, I can commit the patch for 9.3 without Windows support. If
>>>> not, I will move the patch to next CF (for 9.4).
>>>>
>>>> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>>> 
>>> +1 for this approach.  I agree with Dave and Magnus that we don't want
>>> Windows to become a second-class platform, but this patch isn't making
>>> it so.  The #ifdef that peeks inside of an instr_time is already
>>> there, and it's not Tomas's fault that nobody has gotten around to
>>> fixing it before now.
>> 
>> Right.
>> 
>>> OTOH, I think that this sort of thing is quite wrong:
>>> 
>>> +#ifndef WIN32
>>> +           "  --aggregate-interval NUM\n"
>>> +           "               aggregate data over NUM seconds\n"
>>> +#endif
>>> 
>>> The right approach if this can't be supported on Windows is to still
>>> display the option in the --help output, and to display an error
>>> message if the user tries to use it, saying that it is not currently
>>> supported on Windows.  That fact should also be mentioned in the
>>> documentation.
>> 
>> Agreed. This seems to be much better approach.
> 
> Here is the new patch.

Committed (with minor fix).
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Should pg_dump dump larger tables first?