Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:14:59PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribió:
> 
> > --- 17,24 ----
> >   
> >   static void transfer_single_new_db(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter,
> >                          FileNameMap *maps, int size);
> > ! static int transfer_relfile(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter, FileNameMap *map,
> > !                              const char *suffix);
> 
> Uh, does this code assume that forks other than the main one are not
> split in segments?  I think that's a bug, is it not?

Actually, the segment scanning now happens inside transfer_relfile().

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +