Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date
Msg-id 20121023184509.GB8724@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation  (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation  (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Amit kapila wrote:

> Rebased version of patch based on latest code.

Uhm, how can this patch change a caller of PageAddItem() by adding one
more argument, yet not touch bufpage.c at all?  Are you sure this
compiles?

The email subject has a WIP tag; is that still the patch status?  If so,
I assume it's okay to mark this Returned with Feedback and expect a
later version to be posted.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
Next
From: Ants Aasma
Date:
Subject: Re: ToDo: KNN Search should to support DISTINCT clasuse?