Re: Doc patch "only relevant" -> "relevant only" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Abhijit Menon-Sen
Subject Re: Doc patch "only relevant" -> "relevant only"
Date
Msg-id 20121017171946.GB17342@toroid.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc patch "only relevant" -> "relevant only"  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 2012-10-17 09:19:58 -0400, andrew@dunslane.net wrote:
>
> This doesn't appear to correct any ambiguity, nor any grammatical
> error.

FWIW, it's quite standard and uncontroversial "good writing" advice to
push "only" as far right as it can go. It does correct an ambiguity,
but in this case the ambiguity is silly and harmless, so fixing it
seems like nitpicking when you read the patch.

-- Abhijit

P.S. I would fix it anyway.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Deprecating RULES