Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 20120902111701.GB21043@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep  2, 2012 at 01:06:28AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > For "live check" operation, you are checking a running server, so
> > assuming the socket is in the current directory is not going to work.
> > What the code does is to read the 5th line from the running server's
> > postmaster.pid file, which has the socket directory in PG >= 9.1.  For
> > pre-9.1, pg_upgrade uses the compiled-in defaults for socket directory.
> > If the defaults are different between the two servers, the new binaries,
> > e.g. pg_dump, will not work.  The fix is for the user to set pg_upgrade
> > -O to match the old socket directory, and set PGHOST before running
> > pg_upgrade.  I could not find a good way to generate a proper error
> > message because we are blind to the socket directory in pre-9.1.
> > Frankly, this is a problem if the old pre-9.1 server is running in a
> > user-configured socket directory too, so a documentation addition seems
> > right here.
> >
> > So, in summary, this patch moves the socket directory to the current
> > directory all but live check operation, and handles different socket
> > directories for old cluster >= 9.1.  I have added a documentation
> > mention of how to make this work for for pre-9.1 old servers.
> 
> I don't think this is reducing the number of failure modes; it's just
> changing it from one set of obscure cases to a slightly different set
> of obscure cases.

Tom reported problems with having old/new with different default socket
locations.  This fixes that, and reduces the possibility of acciental
connections.  What problems does this add?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: bitmap scan much slower than index scan, hash_search_with_hash_value
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade