Insane behaviour in 8.3.3 - Mailing list pgsql-sql
From | Achilleas Mantzios |
---|---|
Subject | Insane behaviour in 8.3.3 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 201206141139.35601.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Insane behaviour in 8.3.3
Re: Insane behaviour in 8.3.3 Re: Insane behaviour in 8.3.3 |
List | pgsql-sql |
Hello,one remote user reported a problem and i was surprised to witness the following behaviour. It is on postgresql 8.3.3 dynacom=# BEGIN; BEGIN dynacom=# dynacom=# dynacom=# insert into xadmin(appname,apptbl_tmp,gao,id,comment) dynacom-# values('PMS','overhaul_report_tmp','INSERT',nextval('overhaul_report_tmp_pkid_seq'),' zzz '); INSERT 0 1 dynacom=# dynacom=# insert into items_tmp(id,vslwhid,serialno,rh,lastinspdate,classused,classsurvey,classsurveydate,classduedate, dynacom(# classpostponed,classcomment,defid,machtypecount,totalrh,comment,attachments,lastrepdate,pmsstate,xid,classaa) dynacom-# select id,vslwhid,serialno,rh,lastinspdate,classused,classsurvey,classsurveydate,classduedate,classpostponed, dynacom-# classcomment,defid,machtypecount,totalrh,comment,attachments,lastrepdate,pmsstate,currval('xadmin_xid_seq'), dynacom-# classaa from items where id=1261319; INSERT 0 1 dynacom=# -- in the above 'xadmin_xid_seq' has taken a new value in the first insert dynacom=# SELECT currval('xadmin_xid_seq');currval --------- 61972 (1 row) dynacom=# SELECT id from items_tmp WHERE id=1261319 AND xid=61972; id ---------1261319 (1 row) dynacom=# -- ok this is how it should be dynacom=# SELECT id from items_tmp WHERE id=1261319 AND xid=currval('xadmin_xid_seq');id ---- (0 rows) dynacom=# -- THIS IS INSANE This code has run fine (the last SELECT returns exactly one row) for 5,409,779 total transactions thus far, in 70 different postgresql slave installations (mixture of 8.3.3 and 8.3.13) (we are a shipping company), until i got this error report from a user yesterday. What could be causing this? How could i further investigate this? Unfortunately the remote installations are neither physically accessible nor by TCP/IP accesible (comms are done via UUCP and administration via minicom, and the costs are just huge 5 USD/min for 33Kbits/sec). So, i would exhaust all posibilities before deciding to ship a new postgresql versionthere, and remotely upgrade, physically travel to the ship or even trying to do a backup/initdb/restore in the existing version. Any help would be really really appreciated. Also, as you might have understood, upgrading, although generally a good idea, does not apply so easily in our case. Some information about the schema : dynacom=# \d xadmin Table "public.xadmin" Column | Type | Modifiers ------------+-----------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------xid | bigint | not null default nextval(('xadmin_xid_seq'::text)::regclass)appname | text | not nullapptbl_tmp | text | not nullgao | character varying(40) | not nullid | integer | not nullcomment | text | state | text | not null default 'NPY'::textarcedon | timestamp without time zone | default now() Indexes: "xa_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (xid) "xa_appname_idx" btree (appname) "xa_appname_state_idx" btree (appname, state) "xa_state_idx" btree (state) dynacom=# \d items_tmp Table "public.items_tmp" Column | Type | Modifiers -----------------+------------------------+-----------id | integer | not nullvslwhid | integer | serialno | character varying(40) | rh | integer | lastinspdate | date | classused | integer | classaa | text | classsurvey | character varying(100) | classsurveydate | date | classduedate | date | classpostponed | date | classcomment | text | defid | integer | machtypecount | integer | totalrh | integer | comment | character varying(200) | attachments | text[] | lastrepdate | date | pmsstate | character varying(200) | xid | bigint | not null Indexes: "it_tmp_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id, xid) Foreign-key constraints: "items_tmp_xid_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (xid) REFERENCES xadmin(xid) - Achilleas Mantzios IT DEPT