Re: XLog changes for 9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: XLog changes for 9.3
Date
Msg-id 20120613031609.GA14881@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: XLog changes for 9.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:52:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > So you can pretty much kiss goodbye to the idea of pg_upgrade.
> 
> And that is certainly nonsense.  I don't think pg_upgrade even knows
> about this, and if it does we can surely fix it.

pg_upgrade doesn't know anything about xlog files --- all its interaction
in that area is through pg_resetxlog and it doesn't look at the xlog
details.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vlad Arkhipov
Date:
Subject: COMMENT on function's arguments
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for Todo Item : Provide fallback_application_name in contrib/pgbench, oid2name, and dblink