Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Date
Msg-id 20120525151830.GD25444@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:41:23AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo.tech@gmail.com> writes:
> > If anyone has more suggestions, I would like to hear them. Thank you!
>
> Provide a test case?
>
> We recently fixed a couple of O(N^2) loops in pg_dump, but those covered
> extremely specific cases that might or might not have anything to do
> with what you're seeing.  The complainant was extremely helpful about
> tracking down the problems:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2012-03/msg00957.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2012-03/msg00225.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2012-03/msg00230.php

Yes, please help us improve this!  At this point pg_upgrade is limited
by the time to dump/restore the database schema, but I can't get users
to give me any way to debug the speed problems.

Someone reported pg_upgrade took 45 minutes because of pg_dumpall
--schema, which is quite long.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig James
Date:
Subject: Re: Maximum number of sequences that can be created
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas