Sorry for broken message.
> >From I said that the former (spinlock) could be dropped, but the
> latter (read as volatile) should be needed.
I said that the former (spinlock) could be dropped from the view
of functionarity, but the latter (read as volatile) should be
needed.
> >From the view of maintenancibility (suspicious-proof
> expression?), it may be preferable that the manner to read shared
> memory be uniform whole source code if no particular reasons.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
== My e-mail address has been changed since Apr. 1, 2012.
