Re: pg_upgrade and statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Date
Msg-id 20120315154842.GF26534@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and statistics  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:20:02AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>  
> > I think we have two choices --- either migrate the statistics, or
> > adopt my approach to generating incremental statistics quickly.
> > Does anyone see any other options?
>  
> Would it make any sense to modify the incremental approach to do a
> first pass of any tables with target overrides, using the default
> GUC setting, and then proceed through the passes you describe for
> all tables *except* those?  I'm thinking that any overrides were
> probably set because the columns are particularly important in terms
> of accurate statistics, and that running with different GUC settings
> will just be a waste of time for those tables -- if they have a high
> setting for any column, they will sample more blocks for every run,
> right?

I just added text telling users they might want to remove and re-add
those per-table statistics.  I could try coding up something to store
and reset those values, but it is going to be complex, partly because
they are in different databases.   I would need to create a pg_upgrade
schema in every database, store and reset the targets, and restore them
once complete.

I don't think it makes sense to do the custom targets first because it
would likely delay all tables from getting any statistics.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and statistics