Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH
Date
Msg-id 201110150026.p9F0Qcu17015@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Oops, I see a problem.  Right now, our first major release has no zero,
> > e.g. 9.2, while our minors have a third digit, 9.2.5.  The problem is
> > that with this patch it is confusing to have a psql config file that
> > matches 9.2.0, but not 9.2.5, because you can't write 9.2.0.
> 
> Uh, this seems like nonsense.  We've been labeling major releases with
> a dot-zero for some time, and that's embedded in process now (cf
> version_stamp.pl) to the point that we're unlikely to forget to do so.

Ah, I see now.  9.1 has:
#define PG_VERSION "9.1.0"

I rarely see the non-dev trees.  No problem then.

Patch applied.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO
Next
From: Jun Ishiduka
Date:
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby