Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Date
Msg-id 201107112359.p6BNx1B17817@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/28/2011 05:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tis, 2011-06-28 at 17:05 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>> Couldn't you just put a text file on the build farm server with
> >>> recommended branches?
> >> As I told Magnus, that gets ugly because of limitations in MinGW's SDK
> >> perl. I suppose I could just not implement the feature for MinGW, but
> >> I've tried damn hard not to make those sorts of compromises and I'm not
> >> keen to start.
> > The buildfarm code can upload the build result via HTTP; why can't it
> > download a file via HTTP?
> 
> 
> It has to use a separate script to do that. I don't really want to add 
> another one just for this.
> 
> (thinks a bit) I suppose I can make it do:
> 
>     my $url = "http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/branches_of_interest.txt";
>     my $branches_of_interest = `perl -MLWP::Simple -e "getprint(q{$url})"`;
> 
> Maybe that's the best option. It's certainly going to be less code than 
> anything else :-)

Could you pull the list of active branches from our web site HTML?
\
--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: TODO list updated
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained