Re: Indication of db-shared tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Date
Msg-id 201106221924.p5MJOei08770@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indication of db-shared tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Re: Indication of db-shared tables
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mié jun 22 14:31:51 -0400 2011:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Jeff MacDonald's message of mi jun 22 09:27:36 -0400 2011:
> > > > Greetings,
> > > > 
> > > > On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 09:10:02 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > I assumed it was important to indicate if someone was looking at
> > > > > per-database or per-cluster data, like pg_tablespace.  The issue comes
> > > > > up when I do admin training about the system tables.
> > > > 
> > > > +1 
> > > > 
> > > > I favor features that make training easier for the teacher.
> > > 
> > > So what UI would you guys propose?  I don't think widening the output of
> > > frequently used commands like \d or \d+ is okay for a feature with this
> > > small a use case.
> > 
> > I am going to try to add descriptions for system tables for \d+ so maybe
> > I can put it there.
> 
> That would be OK with me, I guess -- something like "shared system
> catalog for databases", you mean?

I was thinking "(shared)" as part of the description.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump vs malloc