Assert failure when rechecking an exclusion constraint - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Assert failure when rechecking an exclusion constraint
Date
Msg-id 20110603222708.GA27476@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Assert failure when rechecking an exclusion constraint
List pgsql-hackers
Commit d2f60a3ab055fb61c8e1056a7c5652f1dec85e00 added an assert to indexam.c's
RELATION_CHECKS to block use of an index while it's being rebuilt.  This
assert trips while rechecking an exclusion constraint after an ALTER TABLE
rebuild:
CREATE TABLE t (    c    int,    EXCLUDE (c WITH =));
INSERT INTO t VALUES (1), (2);ALTER TABLE t ALTER c TYPE smallint USING 1;

Here's the end of the stack trace (at -O1):

#0  0x00007f3d2bae3095 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007f3d2bae4af0 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x0000000000705449 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=<value optimized out>, errorType=<value optimized out>,
fileName=<valueoptimized out>, lineNumber=<value optimized out>) at assert.c:57
 
#3  0x0000000000486148 in index_beginscan_internal (indexRelation=0x7f3d2c6990a0, nkeys=1, norderbys=0) at
indexam.c:283
#4  0x000000000048622c in index_beginscan (heapRelation=0x7f3d2c68fb48, indexRelation=0x6a73, snapshot=0x7fff679d17b0,
nkeys=-1,norderbys=0) at indexam.c:237
 
#5  0x000000000058a375 in check_exclusion_constraint (heap=0x7f3d2c68fb48, index=0x7f3d2c6990a0, indexInfo=0xc97968,
tupleid=0xc8c06c,values=0x7fff679d18d0, isnull=0x7fff679d19e0 "", estate=0xc98ac8, newIndex=1 '\001', errorOK=0 '\000')
atexecUtils.c:1222
 
#6  0x00000000004d164e in IndexCheckExclusion (heapRelation=0x7f3d2c68fb48, indexRelation=0x7f3d2c6990a0,
indexInfo=0xc97968,isprimary=0 '\000', isreindex=1 '\001') at index.c:2328
 
#7  index_build (heapRelation=0x7f3d2c68fb48, indexRelation=0x7f3d2c6990a0, indexInfo=0xc97968, isprimary=0 '\000',
isreindex=1'\001') at index.c:1765
 
#8  0x00000000004d21b8 in reindex_index (indexId=131529, skip_constraint_checks=0 '\000') at index.c:2814
#9  0x00000000004d2450 in reindex_relation (relid=<value optimized out>, flags=6) at index.c:2988
#10 0x000000000052a86a in finish_heap_swap (OIDOldHeap=131524, OIDNewHeap=131531, is_system_catalog=0 '\000',
swap_toast_by_content=<valueoptimized out>, check_constraints=1 '\001', frozenXid=<value optimized out>) at
cluster.c:1427
#11 0x000000000055fc1b in ATRewriteTables (rel=<value optimized out>, cmds=<value optimized out>, recurse=<value
optimizedout>, lockmode=8) at tablecmds.c:3329
 
#12 ATController (rel=<value optimized out>, cmds=<value optimized out>, recurse=<value optimized out>, lockmode=8) at
tablecmds.c:2738
...

I could not come up with an actual wrong behavior arising from this usage, so
I'll tentatively call it a false positive.  reindex_index() could instead
unconditionally clear indexInfo->ii_Exclusion* before calling index_build(),
then pop pendingReindexedIndexes and call IndexCheckExclusion() itself.  Popping
pendingReindexedIndexes as we go can make the success of a reindex_relation()
dependent on the order in which we choose to rebuild indexes, though.

Another option is to just remove the assert as not worth preserving.

Opinions, other ideas?

Thanks,
nm


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: Error in PQsetvalue
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disallow SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE on sequences.