Re: undead index - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jens Wilke
Subject Re: undead index
Date
Msg-id 201105061701.06448.jens.wilke@affinitas.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: undead index  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: undead index  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 17:32:50 Tom Lane wrote:

> Hmm, is this an autogenerated index?

I don't think so.
And to confirm, that i really deleted the new cluster between the pg_upgrade
run and the dump|restore i did it again and was able to revive this index
again:

foo=# \d+ foo.bar_idx
      Index "foo.bar_idx"
  Column  |         Type          | Definition | Storage  | Description
----------+-----------------------+------------+----------+-------------
 ulq_guid | character varying(24) | ulq_guid   | extended |
btree, for table "foo.foo"

But it's again not in the pg_dumpall output, using the same binary like for
the dump|restore.

Regards, Jens

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Bidirectional replication
Next
From: Iain Barnett
Date:
Subject: Locale and UTF8 for template1 in 8.4.4