On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06:30AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> The only thing I've been on the fence about is whether it
> makes more sense to allocate it all up front or to continue to allow
> incremental allocation but set a hard limit on the number of entries
> allocated for each shared memory HTAB. Is there a performance-
> related reason to choose one path or the other?
Seems like it would be marginally better to allocate it up front -- then
you don't have the cost of having to split buckets later as it grows.
Dan
--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
