Re: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING
Date
Msg-id 201103302141.p2ULfrJ29439@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-03-30 at 15:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > pg_upgrade complains if any of the libpq connection variables are set.
> > > That's probably reasonable by default, but it seems to me that we ought
> > > to allow keeping PGCLIENTENCODING set, otherwise various values and
> > > error messages that are coming from the servers will not be in the
> > > encoding appropriate for the terminal.
> > 
> > What is the error message?  I don't see pg_upgrade checking
> > PGCLIENTENCODING.  I do check the cluster encodings.
> 
> It's done via check_for_libpq_envvars().
> 
> Actually, this is particular issue is new in 9.1, because the client
> encoding wasn't a connection option before.

Oh, we just blanket refuse any variable.  OK.  If you think it is safe,
feel free to apply a patch to skip it, or I can.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?