Re: template0 database comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: template0 database comment
Date
Msg-id 201103141527.p2EFR3010139@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: template0 database comment  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: template0 database comment
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> OK, funny guys.  ;-)  Can someone give me the right text.  Obviously I
> >> don' know what template0 is used for either.  Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
> 
> > template0: unmodifiable pristine empty database
> > template1: default template for new databases
> 
> Yeah, I think that the right way to approach this is to have initdb
> comment *both* of those databases.  I don't like that specific wording
> for template0 though.  Maybe
> 
> template0: unmodified copy of original template1 database
> template1: default template for new databases

Tom, the current comment for "template1" is "default template database".
Do you like your above wording better?  It does make it slighly longer.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Macros for time magic values
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Indent authentication overloading