Re: BUG #5857: pg_restore --clean dropping type too soon - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #5857: pg_restore --clean dropping type too soon
Date
Msg-id 201103111205.p2BC5sM14014@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5857: pg_restore --clean dropping type too soon  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Stuart Bishop" <stuart@stuartbishop.net> writes:
> > "pg_restore --clean" appears to have an ordering problem, where a custom
> > type is being dropped before some functions that use that custom type as a
> > parameter, which fails.
>
> It's always worked that way, and is difficult to avoid because of the
> circular dependencies between a type and its I/O functions.  If we were
> to suppress the DROP FUNCTION commands for the I/O functions, we could
> have a non-cosmetic failure: suppose the functions have been created
> in the target DB, but not the type itself?  Then the DROP TYPE CASCADE
> wouldn't remove the functions, and we'd have a conflict when the script
> tries to create them again.
>
> I don't think anyone's ever felt that it was essential for --clean to
> not produce any "no such object" errors, since in general you'd get some
> of those anyway unless the target DB exactly matches the source.  Maybe
> an appropriate response is to document that this is expected.

Applied doc patch attached.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
index e78d275..7f12460 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ PostgreSQL documentation
       <listitem>
        <para>
         Output commands to clean (drop)
-        database objects prior to (the commands for) creating them.
+        database objects prior to outputing the commands for creating them.
+        (Restore might generate some harmless errors.)
        </para>

        <para>

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5924: bug or feature?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5837: PQstatus() fails to report lost connection