Re: Sync Rep v17 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Sync Rep v17
Date
Msg-id 201102190239.p1J2dQT03757@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sync Rep v17  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Sync Rep v17  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Most parameters are set on the primary. Set
> 
>   primary: synchronous_standby_names = 'node1, node2, node3'
> 
> which means that whichever of those standbys connect first will
> become the main synchronous standby. Servers arriving later will
> be potential standbys (standby standbys doesn't sound right...).
> synchronous_standby_names can change at reload.
> 
> Currently, the standby_name is the application_name parameter
> set in the primary_conninfo.
> 
> When we set this for a client, or in postgresql.conf
> 
>   primary: synchronous_replication = on
> 
> then we will wait at commit until the synchronous standby has
> reached the WAL location of our commit point.
> 
> If the current synchronous standby dies then one of the other standbys
> will take over. (I think it would be a great idea to make the
> list a priority order, but I haven't had time to code that).
> 
> If none of the standbys are available, then we don't wait at all
> if allow_standalone_primary is set.
> allow_standalone_primary can change at reload.

Are we going to allow a command to be run when these things happen, like
archive_command does, or is that something for 9.2?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: CopyReadLineText optimization revisited
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_resetxlog display bogosity