Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Date
Msg-id 201101202327.p0KNRqU21459@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Tom Lane wrote:
> Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> writes:
> > Sure - of course - performance, too! It just seems like such an obvious candidate for a configurable option; I'm a
bitsurprised it isn't in there... L  
>
> It *is* configurable: make pg_xlog a symlink.  The reason we don't
> handle this via postgresql.conf is that you could too easily shoot
> yourself in the foot by breaking the link between a data directory
> and its xlogs.  There are no postgresql.conf entries that say
> destroy_all_my_data_immediately_please = on
> but that's more or less what an easily changeable pg_xlog pointer
> would be.
>
> In short: this is not something to change if you don't know what
> you're doing.  If you do, you should be able to handle it using
> the mechanism provided.

Old thread, but no one mentioned that initdb has an option to create a
symlink for you for pg_xlog:

       -X directory, --xlogdir=directory
           This option specifies the directory where the
           transaction log should be stored.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Craig James
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres Backup Utility
Next
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres Backup Utility