Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun dic 27 13:54:56 -0300 2010:
> >> [ lightbulb ] ... although we could improve that quite a bit if we
> >> processed each .h file separately instead of insisting on smashing
> >> everything into one compilation. Let me go try that.
>
> > FWIW I have this patch lingering about that I wrote months ago, to check
> > for header problems (not C++ stuff, just things like forgetting to
> > include some necessary header in some other header). Since it needs a
> > lot of polish (needs to ignore certain headers, and avoid leave
> > lingering files around), I didn't commit it; and I haven't updated it to
> > the new Make recursive stuff, either.
>
> src/tools/pginclude/ already contains several scripts for this sort of
> thing. Bruce runs them by hand occasionally, although I just found out
> that he's evidently not run the does-each-header-compile-standalone
> test in awhile. It would probably pay to automate these.
It is true I have not run those tests in a while.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
